<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Precedings - Alessandro Cucchi</title>
    <link>http://precedings.nature.com/users/1727df287457612e35cc365d20a7a487/</link>
    <description>Documents posted by Alessandro Cucchi</description>
    <dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
    
    <atom:link type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" href="http://precedings.nature.com/users/1727df287457612e35cc365d20a7a487/feed"/>
    <item>
      <title>Varicella notification in immigrants: a brief report from Ferrara, Italy</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3361/version/1</link>
      <description>Background and Aim of the work &amp;#8211; We conducted a survey of varicella cases&amp;#8217; notifications in the immigrant population in the province of Ferrara, Italy.Materials and Methods &#8211; We collected notifications of infectious disease between 2002 and 2006. Results and discussion &amp;#8211; At the end of 2006, the 4.5% (14252 subjects) of total population of the province of Ferrara and its province was represented of immigrants from foreign countries. In this context, between 2002 and 2006, a total of 1969 cases of varicella, including 3.1% related to migrants, were reported. Among immigrants, there were 36 cases in males, and 26 in females. The cases were notified in the 64.5% by the hospital emergency service, in the 16.1% by the paediatrician and in 19.4% by the general practitioner. The incidence appears similar in both populations in childhood: this fact could means an integration in the local epidemiology for varicella of the immigrant school-children.  </description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3361/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:27:23 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Varicella notification in immigrants: a brief report from Ferrara, Italy</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2009.3361.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Alessandro Cucchi</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22T20:27:23Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Immunology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Microbiology</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3361/version/1/files/npre20093361-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adherence to cancer screenings: Is the telephone survey a good method of investigation?</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3016/version/1</link>
      <description>INTRODUCTION &amp;#8211; In order to define subjective variables, the methodology on the assessment of the women participation to screening programs to prevent cervical cancer is presented.MATERIALS AND METHODS &amp;#8211; The study was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered by telephone to a sample of women invited to screening, regardless of their real participation to the Pap test. The phone calls were made within 2 days prior to the Pap test session. The questionnaire contained 12 closed questions. RESULTS &amp;#8211; We contacted a total of 1206 women: a total of 1100 women (93.70%) received the invitation letter and answered to the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS &amp;#8211; The chosen procedure obtained a high percentage of women who agreed to be interviewed.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3016/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:30:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Adherence to cancer screenings: Is the telephone survey a good method of investigation?</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2009.3016.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-04-01</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Alessandro Cucchi</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01T12:30:25Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Cancer</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3016/version/1/files/npre20093016-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
