<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Precedings - Tag feed for visual perception</title>
    <link>http://precedings.nature.com/tags/visual%20perception</link>
    <description>Recently posted documents tagged with 'visual perception'</description>
    <dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
    
    <atom:link type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" href="http://precedings.nature.com/tags/visual%20perception/feed"/>
    <item>
      <title>Can Vision Exist Without Somatosensation?</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3436/version/1</link>
      <description>The interconnection between vision and somatosensation is already well-established and is further supplemented by the evolutionary link between eyes and photoreceptors, and the functional connection between photosensation and thermoreception. However, our analysis hypothesizes a possibility that vision is not just linked to somatosensation, but may not exist without somatosensation. Surprisingly, our photoreceptor itself needs somatosensory proteins for its functioning, and our entire visual pathway depends on somatosensory cues for its functioning.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3436/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:46:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Can Vision Exist Without Somatosensation?</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2009.3436.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Manivannan Muniyandi</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-17T14:46:25Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Molecular Cell Biology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3436/version/1/files/npre20093436-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic reorganization of the middle fusiform gyrus: long-term bird expertise predicts decreased face selectivity</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2467/version/1</link>
      <description>What is the functional relationship between face-selective and expertise-predicated object-selective regions in the human middle fusiform gyrus? In two separate fMRI experiments, superior behaviorally-measured bird expertise predicts both higher middle fusiform gyrus selectivity for birds and, concomitantly, lower selectivity for faces. This finding suggests a long-term dynamic reorganization of the neural mechanisms underlying the visual recognition of faces and non-face.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2467/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:20:53 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Dynamic reorganization of the middle fusiform gyrus: long-term bird expertise predicts decreased face selectivity</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.2467.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-11-05</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Michael J. Tarr</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-11-05T21:20:53Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2467/version/1/files/npre20082467-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Motion-Induced Blindness</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1506/version/1</link>
      <description>Visual disappearance illusions &amp;#8211; such as motion-induced blindness (MIB) &amp;#8211; are commonly used to study the neural underpinnings of visual perception. In such illusions a salient visual target becomes perceptually invisible. Previous studies are inconsistent regarding the role of primary visual cortex (V1) in these illusions. Here we provide physiological and psychophysical evidence supporting a role for V1 in generating MIB.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1506/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:11:41 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Motion-Induced Blindness</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.1506.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Camilo Libedinsky</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-09T22:11:41Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1506/version/1/files/npre20081506-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Koffka&amp;#8217;s Ring Effect Depends on Thickness, Not Continuity</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1433/version/1</link>
      <description>More than 70 years ago Gestalt psychologist Kurt Koffka described a fascinating effect1,2: When a contiguous grey ring is placed on a background half of one shade of grey (different from the ring) and half of another shade of grey, the ring appears to be a homogenous. However, if the ring is slightly divided, now the two halves of the ring appear different shades of grey with the half of the ring on the darker background appearing lighter than the half of the ring on the darker background. The Gestalt principle of continuity in visual perception is invoked to explain this effect. Here we show that in fact when the ring is made thinner it appears heterogeneous even when contiguous. Furthermore, when viewing a thick ring after first viewing a thin ring, the thick ring now too appears heterogenous! These effects are also demonstrated with a colored background and backgrounds with more than two regions. We show that standard simultaneous brightness and color contrast weaken with larger test patches. Thus, Koffka&amp;#8217;s ring effect is due to vanishingly weak simultaneous contrast for a sufficiently thick ring, not continuity.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1433/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:56:36 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Koffka&amp;#8217;s Ring Effect Depends on Thickness, Not Continuity</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2007.1433.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-04-27</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Eric L. Altschuler</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2007-12-17T22:56:36Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1433/version/1/files/npre20071433-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
