<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Precedings - Tag feed for perception</title>
    <link>http://precedings.nature.com/tags/perception</link>
    <description>Recently posted documents tagged with 'perception'</description>
    <dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
    
    <atom:link type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" href="http://precedings.nature.com/tags/perception/feed"/>
    <item>
      <title>Vision senses number directly</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2792/version/1</link>
      <description>We have recently suggested that numerosity is a primary sensory attribute, showing that it is strongly susceptible to adaptation. Here we use the Method of Single Stimuli (MSS) to show that observers can extract a running average of the numerosity of a succession of stimuli and hold it in mind for use as a standard of comparison for subsequent stimuli. Accuracy and precision of judgments are high and not reduced by potentially misleading variables like texture density or display area.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2792/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:29:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Vision senses number directly</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2009.2792.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-01-16</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>David C. Burr</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-16T16:29:46Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2792/version/1/files/npre20092792-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-modal facilitation of visual and tactile motion</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2675/version/1</link>
      <description>Robust and versatile perception of the world is augmented considerably when information from our five separate sensory systems is combined. Much recent evidence has demonstrated near-optimal integration across senses, but it remains unclear at what level the integration occurs, at a &amp;quot;sensory&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;decisional&amp;quot; level. Here we show that non-informative &amp;quot;pedestal&amp;quot; motion stimuli in one sensory modality (vision or touch) selectively lowers thresholds in the other, to the same degree as pedestals in the same modality: strong evidence for functionally important cross-sensory integration at early levels of sensory processing.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2675/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:45:36 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Cross-modal facilitation of visual and tactile motion</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.2675.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-12-18</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>David Burr</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-18T13:45:36Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2675/version/1/files/npre20082675-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facial Expression Processing Varies with Political Affiliation</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2414/version/1</link>
      <description>Conservative political beliefs have been linked to heightened stress reactivity and protective cognitive biases. Using a facial discrimination task designed to measure perceptions of threat (vs. non threat) and dominance (vs. submissiveness), I show that Republicans demonstrate a greater tendency to interpret ambiguous facial stimuli as expressing more threatening and more dominant emotions than do Democrats. The findings suggest the political ideology may be associated with basic social perceptual sensitivities.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2414/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:14:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Facial Expression Processing Varies with Political Affiliation</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.2414.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Jacob Vigil</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-21T10:14:34Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Ecology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2414/version/1/files/npre20082414-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Where did Words Come from? A Linking Theory of Sound Symbolism and Natural Language Evolution</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2369/version/1</link>
      <description>Where did words come from? The traditional view is that the relation between the sound of a word and its meaning is arbitrary. An alternative hypothesis, known as sound symbolism, holds that form-meaning correspondence is systematic. Numerous examples of sound symbolism exist across natural language phyla. Moreover, cross-linguistic similarities suggest that sound symbolism represents a language universal. For example, many unrelated languages affix an &amp;quot;ee&amp;quot; sound to words in order to emphasize size distinctions or express affection (e.g., look at the teeny weeny baby); other such phonetic universals are evident for object mass, color, brightness, and aggression. We hypothesize that sound symbolism reflects sensitivity to an ecological law (i.e., Hooke&amp;apos;s Law) governing an inverse relation between object mass and acoustic resonance. In two experiments healthy adults showed high agreement in matching pure tones to color swatches and nonwords to novel objects as linear functions of frequency and luminance. These results support a degree of non-arbitrariness in integrating visual and auditory information. We discuss implications for sound symbolism as a factor underlying language evolution.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2369/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:02:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Where did Words Come from? A Linking Theory of Sound Symbolism and Natural Language Evolution</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.2369.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-10-06</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Jamie Reilly</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-06T13:02:22Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Developmental Biology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Ecology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2369/version/1/files/npre20082369-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weight Stigma and Educators&amp;#8217; Perceptions of Children&amp;#8217;s Psychological Symptoms</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2133/version/1</link>
      <description>Objective: To investigate whether weight stigma influences educators&amp;#8217; judgments about psychological symptoms in children.Design: Experimental study manipulating the weight status of children with school problems and examining implicit and explicit anti-fat attitudes as potential moderators of stigmatizing judgments.Subjects: 188 pre-service educators.Measurements: Attributions of laziness as primary dependent variable plus measures of implicit and explicit anti-fat attitudes as potential moderators.Results: Educators were more likely to attribute laziness to overweight children with school problems. Implicit anti-fat attitudes moderated this effect.Conclusion: Spontaneous anti-fat attitudes were importantly related to educators&amp;#8217; biases in understanding the psychological problems of obese children at school. Educators with more negative implicit anti-fat attitudes were more likely to attribute the school-relevant psychological symptoms of obese children to laziness. Explicit anti-fat attitudes did not moderate these attributions.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2133/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:30:44 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Weight Stigma and Educators&amp;#8217; Perceptions of Children&amp;#8217;s Psychological Symptoms</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.2133.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>John Pryor</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01T09:30:44Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Developmental Biology</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2133/version/1/files/npre20082133-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Young children do not integrate visual and haptic information</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1521/version/1</link>
      <description>Several studies have shown that adults integrate visual and haptic information (and information from other modalities) in a statistically optimal fashion, weighting each sense according to its reliability. To date no studies have investigated when this capacity for cross-modal integration develops. Here we show that prior to eight years of age, integration of visual and haptic spatial information is far from optimal, with either vision or touch dominating totally, even in conditions where the dominant sense is far less precise than the other (assessed by discrimination thresholds). For size discrimination, haptic information dominates in determining both perceived size and discrimination thresholds, while for orientation discrimination vision dominates. By eight-ten years, the integration becomes statistically optimal, like adults. We suggest that during development, perceptual systems require constant recalibration, for which cross-sensory comparison is important. Using one sense to calibrate the other precludes useful combination of the two sources.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1521/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:00:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>Young children do not integrate visual and haptic information</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2008.1521.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>David C. Burr</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-16T16:00:34Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1521/version/1/files/npre20081521-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A visual sense of number</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1353/version/1</link>
      <description>Evidence exists for a non-verbal capacity to apprehend number, in humans1 (including infants2,3) and in other primates4-6. Here we show that perceived numerosity is susceptible to adaptation, along with primary visual properties of a scene like colour, contrast, size and speed. Apparent numerosity was decreased by adapting to large numbers of dots and increased by adapting to small numbers, the effect depended entirely on the numerosity of the adapter, not on contrast, size, orientation or pixel density, and occurred with very low adapter contrasts. We suggest that numerosity is also an independent primary visual property, not reducible to others like spatial frequency or density of texture7.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1353/version/1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:32:03 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>A visual sense of number</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2007.1353.1</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2008-04-22</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>David Burr</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2007-11-20T12:32:03Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Neuroscience</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/1353/version/1/files/npre20071353-1.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
