<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nature Precedings - Tag feed for gene selection</title>
    <link>http://precedings.nature.com/tags/gene%20selection</link>
    <description>Recently posted documents tagged with 'gene selection'</description>
    <dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
    
    <atom:link type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" href="http://precedings.nature.com/tags/gene%20selection/feed"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Reproducibility of Lists of Differentially Expressed Genes in Microarray Studies</title>
      <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/306/version/2</link>
      <description>Reproducibility is a fundamental requirement in scientific experiments and clinical contexts.  Recent publications raise concerns about the reliability of microarray technology because of the apparent lack of agreement between lists of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).  In this study we demonstrate that (1) such discordance may stem from ranking and selecting DEGs solely by statistical significance (P) derived from widely used simple t-tests; (2) when fold change (FC) is used as the ranking criterion, the lists become much more reproducible, especially when fewer genes are selected; and (3) the instability of short DEG lists based on P cutoffs is an expected mathematical consequence of the high variability of the t-values.  We recommend the use of FC ranking plus a non-stringent P cutoff as a baseline practice in order to generate more reproducible DEG lists.  The FC criterion enhances reproducibility while the P criterion balances sensitivity and specificity.</description>
      <guid>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/306/version/2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:18:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <dc:title>The Reproducibility of Lists of Differentially Expressed Genes in Microarray Studies</dc:title>
      <dc:identifier>hdl:10101/npre.2007.306.2</dc:identifier>
      <dc:date>2007-07-03</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Leming D. Shi</dc:creator>
      <prism:publicationName>Nature Precedings</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-03T12:18:21Z</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:category>Manuscript</prism:category>
      <prism:section>Biotechnology</prism:section>
      <prism:section>Bioinformatics</prism:section>
      <media:thumbnail url="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/306/version/2/files/npre2007306-2.pdf.thumb.png"/>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
