background image
Seasonal changes in brain serotonin transporter binding in short 5-
HTTLPR-allele carriers but not in long-allele homozygotes
Jan Kalbitzer
1,2*
, David Erritzoe
1,2
, Klaus K. Holst
2,3
, Finn Å. Nielsen
2,4
, Lisbeth
Marner
1,2
, Szabolcs Lehel
2,5
, Tine Arentzen
1,2
, Terry L. Jernigan
2,6
, and Gitte M.
Knudsen
1,2
1
Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet,
Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
4
Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of
Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
5
PET and Cyclotron Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen,
Denmark
6
Danish Research Center for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital
Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

background image
Light deprivation is a known environmental stressor in Scandinavia and other regions of
high latitude; in a large fraction of the population, behavioral changes such as reduced
activity, higher food-intake, and increased urge to sleep take place during months with
few or even no daylight hours
1
. In some people, this environmental stress can provoke a
particular form of mood disorder, termed seasonal affective disorder (SAD), which is
characterized by the occurrence of depressive symptoms in winter. This observation led
to the successful development of the rational and efficient treatment strategy of bright
light therapy
2
.

Several findings suggest that SAD is mediated through the serotonin (5-HT) system. In
post mortem human brain samples, 5-HT concentrations are lowest in people dying in the
winter
3
. Also, the concentration of the serotonin metabolite 5-HIAA is lower in jugular
blood samples collected in winter
4
. These biomarkers may be associated with seasonal
changes in the activity of plasma-membrane serotonin transporter (5-HTT) that serves a
central role in neural serotonin transmission by regulating synaptic interstitial 5-HT
levels
5, 6
. However, previously there has been no clear evidence for seasonal variation in
the 5-HTT binding in brain in vivo. Two contradictory brain molecular imaging studies,
one reporting lower binding
7
and one higher
8
binding in winter compared to summer,
suffered from small sample sizes, questionable criteria for the cut-offs between summer
and winter, and radioligands less specific than those available today.
However, the link between 5-HTT and SAD is also pointed out by the observation that
carriers of a 44-base pair deletion in the 5-HTT-linked polymorphic region (short 5-
HTTLPR allele = S-allele) generally are more vulnerable to the disorder than carriers of
the insertion (long 5-HTTLPR allele = L-allele)
9
. This polymorphism influences 5-HTT
expression, with lower expression in carriers of the S-allele
5
. In comparison to L-allele
homozygotes, S-allele carriers have increased propensity to develop mood disorders in
response to stressful environmental cues
10, 11
, in particular in response to seasonal
changes
9, 12
. Further, in functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) studies exposure to
stressful and fearful environmental cues evoke greater limbic activation in S-allele
carriers
13
. However, there was no difference in cerebral 5-HTT binding between carriers
background image
of the S-allele and L-allele homozygotes in a two large samples of 96 healthy
volunteers
14
measured in vivo with single photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT) and of 42 healthy volunteers
15
measured with positron emission tomography
(PET). Only when subjects were stratified according to an additional single nucleotide
polymorphism (SNP) on the L-allele, which has not been taken into account by most
activation studies, were differences in in vivo 5-HTT binding identified
16, 17
. Furthermore,
phasic 5-HTT changes, which would be the molecular equivalent to the endophenotype
identified by activation studies, in terms of a different molecular response to
environmental cues in S-allele carriers compared to L-allele homozygotes, have ­ to our
knowledge - not yet been studied with PET.
We sought evidence for seasonal variation in the 5-HTT binding data from a sample of
54 healthy subjects studied with the highly specific radioligand [
11
C]DASB
18
. To avoid
arbitrary classification, we predicted [
11
C]DASB binding with the number of daylight
minutes
at
the
latitude
of
Copenhagen
(http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/Dur_OneYear.php/), and incorporated adjustment for
age and gender in a general linear model. We found that length of daylight time in
minutes correlates negatively with BP
ND
for [
11
C]DASB in the putamen and the caudate
(putamen: -0.0438 BP
ND
/(100 minutes) [-0.0689; -0.0186], p=0.001, caudate: -0.0363 [-
0.0702; -0.0023] BP
ND
/(100 minutes), p = .037), with a similar tendency in the thalamus
(-0.0299 BP
ND
/(100 minutes) [-0.0656; 0.00581, p=0.099), but found no such association
in the midbrain (0.0192 BP
ND
/(100 minutes) [-0.0858; 0.1242], p=0.715). The findings
were also reproduced when data were modeled to a harmonic function that allows for a
time delay in the seasonal effect. Correction for age and gender revealed a marked gender
effect (higher binding in men) in the caudate (p = 0.0002), and decreasing [
11
C]DASB
BP
ND
with age in the putamen (p = 0.034) and the thalamus (p = 0.043). It could be
argued that seasonal changes in availability of food selection and seasonal changes in
food preferences might affect neural serotonin levels through variations in tryptophan-
intake. However, in our sample there was no correlation between [
11
C]DASB BP
ND
and
plasma tryptophan, neither in terms of absolute concentration nor relative to large neutral
background image
amino acids with which tryptophan is competing at the blood-brain barrier
19
. Also, there
was no seasonal variation of absolute or relative tryptophan concentrations in our sample.
We then asked if the seasonal effect was more pronounced in S-alleles carriers, given the
evidence from activation and population studies. We stratified our sample according to 5-
HTTLPR-allelic status, and searched for a gene-daylight interaction effect; 19 subjects
were homozygote L-allele carriers and 35 subjects were S-allele carriers. Again in
putamen, we found a significant gene*daylight effect (p, corrected for age and gender =
0.0448) with a negative correlation between the [
11
C]DASB BP
ND
and daylight time in
carriers of the S-allele, but not in carriers of the L-allele (Figures 1 and 2).
Consistent with prior studies in which SAD patients had a higher likelihood of being S-
allele carriers
9, 12
, and having higher 5-HTT binding during depressive episodes
20
, we
found that the 5-HTT binding in carriers of the S-allele is affected by seasonal changes,
but not in carriers of the L-allele. We found the strongest seasonal effect in the putamen,
an anatomical region with a dense serotonin innervation
18
, that is implicated in motor
functions, but also in processing of aversive stimuli
21, 22
. We did not find any seasonal
variation in midbrain, where the serotonergic cell bodies are located
23
. Possibly, [
11
C]-
DASB is merely reflecting the number of neurons than 5-HTT tonus in this region and
thus not sensitive to seasonal effects.
By examining the effect of daylight hours on the serotonergic system, we identified a
distinct neurobiological endophenotype for the short 5-HTTLPR-allele with dynamic
seasonal changes in 5-HTT binding. The neurobiological endophenotype identified here
directly links activation studies, showing responses on the neural circuit level, with
dynamic changes in transporter expression measured in vivo.
Acknowledgements
We thank CL Licht for continuous inspiration and critical reviewing of the manuscript.
background image
Funding
The study was funded by the Lundbeck Foundation and the Capital Region Hospital
Corporation. The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation donated the Cyclotron and the PET-
scanner.
Reference List

1.
Kasper,S., Wehr,T.A., Bartko,J.J., Gaist,P.A., & Rosenthal,N.E.
Epidemiological findings of seasonal changes in mood and behavior. A
telephone survey of Montgomery County, Maryland. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46,
823-833 (1989).
2.
Rosenthal,N.E. et al. Seasonal affective disorder. A description of the
syndrome and preliminary findings with light therapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
41, 72-80 (1984).
3.
Carlsson,A., Svennerholm,L., & Winblad,B. Seasonal and circadian
monoamine variations in human brains examined post mortem. Acta Psychiatr.
Scand. Suppl
280, 75-85 (1980).
4.
Lambert,G.W., Reid,C., Kaye,D.M., Jennings,G.L., & Esler,M.D. Effect
of sunlight and season on serotonin turnover in the brain. Lancet 360, 1840-
1842 (2002).
5.
Lesch,K.P. et al. Association of anxiety-related traits with a
polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274,
1527-1531 (1996).
6.
Canli,T. & Lesch,K.P. Long story short: the serotonin transporter in
emotion regulation and social cognition. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1103-1109 (2007).
7.
Neumeister,A. et al. Seasonal variation of availability of serotonin
transporter binding sites in healthy female subjects as measured by [123I]-2
beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane and single photon emission
computed tomography. Biol. Psychiatry 47, 158-160 (2000).
8.
Buchert,R. et al. Is correction for age necessary in SPECT or PET of the
central serotonin transporter in young, healthy adults? J. Nucl. Med. 47, 38-42
(2006).
9.
Rosenthal,N.E. et al. Role of serotonin transporter promoter repeat length
polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in seasonality and seasonal affective disorder. Mol.
Psychiatry
3, 175-177 (1998).
background image
10.
Gotlib,I.H., Joormann,J., Minor,K.L., & Hallmayer,J. HPA axis reactivity:
a mechanism underlying the associations among 5-HTTLPR, stress, and
depression. Biol. Psychiatry 63, 847-851 (2008).
11.
Caspi,A. et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a
polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301, 386-389 (2003).
12.
Willeit,M. et al. A polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in the serotonin
transporter promoter gene is associated with DSM-IV depression subtypes in
seasonal affective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 942-946 (2003).
13.
Hariri,A.R. et al. Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response
of the human amygdala. Science 297, 400-403 (2002).
14.
van Dyck,C.H. et al. Central serotonin transporter availability measured
with [123I]beta-CIT SPECT in relation to serotonin transporter genotype. Am. J.
Psychiatry
161, 525-531 (2004).
15.
Parsey,R.V. et al. Effect of a triallelic functional polymorphism of the
serotonin-transporter-linked promoter region on expression of serotonin
transporter in the human brain. Am J Psychiatry 163, 48-51 (2006).
16.
Praschak-Rieder,N. et al. Novel 5-HTTLPR Allele Associates with Higher
Serotonin Transporter Binding in Putamen: A [(11)C] DASB Positron Emission
Tomography Study. Biol. Psychiatry(2007).
17.
Reimold,M. et al. Midbrain serotonin transporter binding potential
measured with [(11)C]DASB is affected by serotonin transporter genotype. J.
Neural Transm.
114, 635-639 (2007).
18.
Houle,S., Ginovart,N., Hussey,D., Meyer,J.H., & Wilson,A.A. Imaging
the serotonin transporter with positron emission tomography: initial human
studies with [11C]DAPP and [11C]DASB. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1719-1722
(2000).
19.
Knudsen,G.M., Pettigrew,K.D., Patlak,C.S., Hertz,M.M., & Paulson,O.B.
Asymmetrical transport of amino acids across the blood-brain barrier in
humans. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 10, 698-706 (1990).
20.
Willeit,M. et al. Enhanced Serotonin Transporter Function during
Depression in Seasonal Affective Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 33,
1503-1513 (2008).
21.
Canli,T., Congdon,E., Todd,C.R., & Lesch,K.P. Additive effects of
serotonin transporter and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 gene variation on neural
correlates of affective processing. Biol. Psychol.(2008).
background image
22.
Zald,D.H. & Pardo,J.V. The neural correlates of aversive auditory
stimulation. Neuroimage. 16, 746-753 (2002).
23.
Hornung,J.P. The human raphe nuclei and the serotonergic system. J.
Chem. Neuroanat. 26, 331-343 (2003).
background image
Figure 1. Left figure illustrates the seasonal effect on [
11
C]DASB BP
ND
(putamen) with
pointwise confidence limits, modeled as a harmonic function with period 1 year
(estimated peak in the middle of December, SE = 21 days, in good agreement with the
model using daylight minutes as a predictor) adjusting for age and gender. The plotted
points are the partial residuals (male of mean age). The functional form was validated by
including additional frequency components and by comparison with estimates from an
additive model. The right figure displays the interaction between number of daylight
minutes and HTTLPR-allelic status adjusting for age and gender. For comparison with
the left figure the estimated linear response as a function of daylight minutes was
transformed to a function of calendar time.
background image
Figure 2. Results of voxel-based analysis using parametric images representing specific
5-HTT binding, all normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space.
Correlations between [
11
C]DASB BP
ND
(adjusted for age and gender) and amount of
daylight on the day of the scan in Copenhagen.
background image
Supplemental information
Subjects
Fifty-four healthy volunteers were recruited by advertisement for a research protocol
approved by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, DK [(KF) 01-
156/04, (KF) 01-124/04, and (KF) 11-283038]. After complete description of the study to
the subjects, written informed consent was obtained from 37 males with a mean age of 34
yrs (SD 18 yrs), and from 17 females with a mean age of 34 yrs (SD 20 yrs). Exclusion
criteria for all test persons included medical history, drug abuse or psychiatric disorders.
All subjects had a normal neurological examination and a magnetic resonance (MR)
image of the brain without pathological findings.
PET scans
PET scans were performed with an 18-ring GE-Advance scanner (General Electric,
Milwaukee, WI, USA), operating in 3D acquisition mode, and
producing 35 image slices
with an interslice distance of 4.25 mm. Following a 10 min transmission scan, a dynamic
90 minute long emission recording was initiated upon intravenous injection during 12 sec
of mean 487 (SD 90) MBq (range: 246 - 601) [
11
C]DASB with mean specific activity of
32 (SD 16) GBq/µmol (range: 9 - 82). The emission
recording consisted of 36 frames,
increasing progressively in duration from 10 sec to 10 min. The attenuation and decay
corrected recordings were reconstructed by filtered back projection using a 6 mm Hann
filter.
MR scans
Structural
brain scans were acquired on a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3T MR scanner with
an eight-channel head coil (In vivo, FL, USA). Thirty-five subjects underwent a high-
resolution 3D T1-weighted, sagittal, magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo
(MPRAGE) scan of the head (MPRAGE1: echo time (TE)/repetition time (TR)/inversion
time(TI)=3.93/1540/800 ms; slice resolution=75%; Bandwidth=130 Hz/Px; Echo
spacing=9.8 ms) and fifteen subjects underwent a 3D T1-weighted, sagittal, MPRAGE
(MPRAGE2: TE/TR/TI=3.04/1550/800 ms; slice resolution=100%; Bandwidth=170
background image
Hz/Px; Echo spacing=7.7ms). Common to both MPRAGE's was a flip angle of 9°, a
FOV of 256 mm, a matrix of 256x256, 1x1x1mm voxels and 192 slices.
MR/PET co-registration
All time-frames of the attenuation-corrected emission recording were automatically
aligned to frame 26 using the AIR algorithm
1
. In a next step we used a mean PET image,
averaging time-frames 10-36 for co-registration to the individual MR image using the
AIR algorithm
2
; the quality of each co-registration was controlled visually.
VOI analysis
The VOI were delineated automatically as described in Svarer et al
3
in order to identify
the volumes in a user-independent fashion. For each of the 10-template VOI sets, a 12-
parameter affine transformation and a warping field was calculated
between the template
MR image and the individual MR image for a subject. Having obtained the MR/PET co-
registration for the same individual as described above, the template VOI sets are then
transferred to the dynamic PET image space for each subject, using the identified
transformation parameters. From the VOI sets, a probability map was created for each
subject, and a common VOI set was threshold-generated. These VOI sets were then used
for automatic extraction of time activity curves (TAC) for midbrain and volume-weighted
(left-right) averages for bilateral thalamus, caudate, putamen and cerebellum for all
subjects. The
midbrain, the caudate, the putamen and the thalamus were selected as
representative brain regions of homogenous, high 5-HTT binding
4
since we expected that
a genetic predisposition would lead to a global scaling effect. The TAC extracted for the
cerebellum was used as the reference tissue input for kinetic modeling.
Quantification of non-displaceable tracer uptake
The outcome parameter of the [
11
C]DASB binding within a brain region is the non-
displaceable binding potential, designated BP
ND
. The BP
ND
was calculated for the four
VOI using the cerebellum input as reference region with non-specific binding. We used a
modified reference tissue model designed specifically for quantification of [
11
C]DASB
background image
(MRTM/MRTM2) as described and evaluated by Ichise et al.
5
using the PKIN tool of the
software PMOD version 2.9 : A fixed washout constant, designated k2', was calculated
for each individual as an average of k2 in caudate, putamen and thalamus relative to
cerebellum using MRTM. Subsequently, k2' was used as a constrained input parameter
for the calculation of BP
ND
in the four VOIs relative to cerebellum.
Parametric images
For the voxel-based analysis, parametric images representing BP
ND
for each voxel were
calculated for all subjects from the dynamic PET images. Using the PXMOD tool of the
PMOD software, we imported the VOI, generated as described above, and re-calculated
k2' relative to cerebellum using MRTM. As described by Ichise et al.
6
, we applied an R1
(tracer delivery to the VOI relative to cerebellum, to some extent reflecting blood flow)
threshold of 0.3 to exclude noisy voxels, particularly seen in regions with low tracer
clearance. Additionally, we restricted the BP
ND
outcome to range between 0 and 10. The
resulting parametric images were filtered with a 3 mm median filter in their native space.
SPM5 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm5/) was used to normalize the
parametric images to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using a warping field
estimated by normalization of each subject's co-registered MR image. Subsequently, a 12
mm Gaussian filter was applied to all normalized images.
Genotyping
Blood samples for DNA analysis were taken during the scanning and immediately frozen
and stored at -20°C until further analysis. DNA was extracted from the blood using a
Qiagen Mini kit using the guidelines included in the kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) 5-
HTTLPR (SLC6A4; 17q11.1-q12) genotyping was performed using a TaqMan 5'-
exonuclease allelic discrimination assay according to the instructions provided by the
manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, Assay-on-Demand). The ABI
7500 multiplex PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) was
used for this analysis.
Effect of plasma tryptophan
background image
Plama amino acids Blood samples were collected in heparinized vials and put on ice until
centrifuged. Plasma was stored at -80 degrees until analyzed. Immediately after the
samples were thawn sulphosalicylic acid was added to precipitate protein and norleucine
was added as internal standard. The samples were then measured with HPLC using a
Lithium Cation Exchange Column (Pickering,
www.pickeringlabs.com
). Tryptophan
competes in particular with leucine, isoleucine, valine, tyrosine, and phenylalanine at the
blood-brain barrier. We therefore measured concentrations of all these LNAAs and
calculated both absolute plasma tryptophan measures as well as tryptophan load relative
to the other LNAAs and searched for correlations of boths with daylight hours and with
[
11
C]DASB BP
ND
. We found no significant correlations (p-value > 0.1).
Reference List
1.
Woods,R.P., Grafton,S.T., Watson,J.D., Sicotte,N.L., & Mazziotta,J.C.
Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear
models. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22, 153-165 (1998).
2.
Woods,R.P., Grafton,S.T., Watson,J.D., Sicotte,N.L., & Mazziotta,J.C.
Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear
models. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22, 153-165 (1998).
3.
Svarer,C. et al. MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in
human brain PET images using probability maps. Neuroimage. 24, 969-979
(2005).
4.
Houle,S., Ginovart,N., Hussey,D., Meyer,J.H., & Wilson,A.A. Imaging
the serotonin transporter with positron emission tomography: initial human
studies with [11C]DAPP and [11C]DASB. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 1719-1722
(2000).
5.
Ichise,M. et al. Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods:
application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin
transporter in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 23, 1096-1112 (2003).
6.
Ichise,M. et al. Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods:
application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin
transporter in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 23, 1096-1112 (2003).