hdl:10101/npre.2007.1258.1
2 votes

Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry?

Lars Chittka1 and Daniel Osorio2

Correspondence: (Login to view email address)

  1. Queen Mary University of London
  2. University of Sussex

This manuscript is a preprint. A published version is available at:

10.1371/journal.pbio.0050339 (Peer Reviewed) Published in PLoS Biol 5(12): e339
Document Type:
Manuscript
Date:
Received 26 October 2007 11:51 UTC; Posted 26 October 2007
Subjects:
Ecology, Neuroscience
Tags:
Abstract:

Many palatable insects, for example hoverflies, deter predators by mimicking well-defended insects such as wasps. However, for human observers, these flies often seem to be little better than caricatures of wasps – their visual appearance and behaviour are easily distinguishable. This imperfect mimicry baffles evolutionary biologists, because one might expect natural selection to do a more thorough job. Here we discuss two types of cognitive processes that might explain why mimics distinguishable mimics might enjoy increased protection from predation. Speed accuracy tradeoffs in predator decision making might give imperfect mimics sufficient time to escape, and predators under time constraint might avoid time-consuming discriminations between well-defended models and inaccurate edible mimics, and instead adopt a “safety first” policy of avoiding insects with similar appearance. Categorization of prey types by predators could mean that wholly dissimilar mimics may be protected, provided they share some common property with noxious prey.

Discussion

Votes:

2 votes

(Login to vote)

Comments:

0 comments

(Login to post a comment)

(Login to share with a colleague)

Additional information

License:
This document is licensed to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License
How to cite this document:

Chittka, Lars and Osorio, Daniel. Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry?. Available from Nature Precedings <http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2007.1258.1> (2007)

Version info:

Published version:

10.1371/journal.pbio.0050339 (Peer Reviewed) Published in PLoS Biol 5(12): e339

Other versions of this document in Nature Precedings

None.

Other versions of this document elsewhere on the web

None known.

Participate

Related Documents

Advertisement